We've heard from a lot of Pinal County residents who are confused by the Board's public claims about our Task Force Model agreement with ICE and what the law actually allows.

You deserve clarity - not spin.

This partnership isn't politics. It's public safety. PCAO is using every lawful tool in the toolbox to protect our residents.

It also aligns with President Trump's public-safety priorities: remove repeat and violent offenders, dismantle trafficking networks, and restore the rule of law.

Let's be clear: we target specific offenders based on documented criminal behavior, with warrants, already known by law enforcement. We are not patrolling communities.

Here's where the narrative is misleading:

Myth #1: "The Sheriff already does this."

Yes—the Sheriff has long cooperated with ICE, and that continues. When criminals land in jail after committing new crimes, ICE is notified and can act. That matters. But jail processing is only one tool.

287(g) has three models: Jail Enforcement (in-custody screening), Warrant Service (serving ICE warrants in jail), and Task Force (ICE-supervised operations targeting specific offenders).

The Sheriff uses the jail model. PCAO signed the Task Force model—because Pinal needs more than one tool.

The Task Force model allows all those who participate to receive information about known criminals in our community that should be arrested and held accountable. We shouldn't wait for new victims to arrest known violent criminals.

Myth #2: "PCAO has no law enforcement."

Wrong. Arizona law allows county attorneys to employ AZPOST-certified, sworn peace officers as investigators. This is standard across Arizona and has been for decades.

They gather intelligence, support investigations, and help prevent additional crimes—working with the Sheriff, task forces, and now ICE.

Myth #3: "This was signed in secret."

False. In July, we asked to address it in an open meeting—not for permission, but to notify the Board of our intent. The purpose was to provide the board and the public with much needed information about the program and give an opportunity to ask questions. We do not need Board approval to carry out our constitutional duties.

Myth #4: "Outside counsel said it's void, so it's void."

A legal opinion is not a court ruling. Reasonable lawyers can disagree. But the Board declared the issue "settled" and presented only one side to the public. That's not transparency. That's narrative control.

Bottom line: this is about lawful authority, proper process, and protecting the people of Pinal County.

Public safety isn't a talking point. It's our job.

Written by Brad Miller - the Pinal County Attorney, a career prosecutor and Marine Corps Reserve Lieutenant Colonel committed to public safety, victim advocacy, and enforcing the rule of law.

----------------------------------

The views and opinions expressed in this letter are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of SanTanValley.com. Letters to the editor are published to promote open discussion and give voice to our readers' diverse viewpoints. The content of this letter is the sole responsibility of Roberto Reveles, who has submitted it for publication.

If you would like to share your thoughts or respond to this letter, we welcome your submission. Please send your letters here or drop your comments below ⬇️